heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
TV news junkies and everyone on afterellen.com know of Rachel Maddow's many skills, but what they don't know is that Maddow is afraid to be in the kitchen. She was on The Martha Stewart Show yesterday and it was all awkward and adorable.



Despite her failings as a 1337 master chef, she can mix a mean drink. I'll let her tend my bar any day.



Original Article
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
Haha, there's a Punahou alumni in the White House!

*gloats*

Okay, I'm done now.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die


Most of you have probably heard about this already, but just in case, I give you LOLZ.
heart1e55m00mba: (River - counting the intervals)


"Why does this matter to you? What is it to you? In a time of impermanence and fly-by-night relationships these people over here want the same chance at permanence and happiness that is your option."
heart1e55m00mba: (Shizuru - Crash & Burn)
I should be happy that we finally have a sane person going into the White House, and we don't have to worry about President Palin (*shuddertwitchtwitch*). And I really am, especially since he's a Punahou alumni (oh god they're going to gloat liek WOAH). But I'm kind of really disappointed in the Californian voters and their amazing stupidity.

[political rant] )

SOURCE
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)


OMG the Blake Lively bit at the end was absolutely brilliant. LMAO!
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)


For all two of you who didn't see the latest SNL Palin spoof.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)


Tina Fey and Amy Poehler re-enact the Sarah Palin/Katie Couric CBS interview.

Epic amount of lolz. EPIC.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)


And what I don't understand is why Hilary supporters are going to their side. Do they understand that Palin represents almost the exact opposite of Hilary while still being female?

OMFGROFL

Jun. 1st, 2008 11:02 pm
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)


I lol-ed until I could lol no more.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
Info and link to a petition asking that Rice actually answer questions and not reply with "don't question my integrity." (Assuming she has any...)

WTF mate?

Dec. 9th, 2004 08:19 am
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
And we quote"it's not censorship". You just keep telling yourself that ass wipe.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
So not funny...This is slightly upsetting. We mean...it's LJ...you don't need to be going around like a paranoid fuck just because Bush has poisoned your mind.
heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
Pending Draft Legislation Targeted for Spring 2005
The Draft will Start in June 2005
link

There is pending legislation in the House and Senate (twin bills: S 89 and HR 163) which will time the program's initiation so the draft can begin at early as Spring 2005 -- just after the 2004 presidential election. The administration is quietly trying to get these bills passed now, while the public's attention is on the elections, so our action on this is needed immediately.

$28 million has been added to the 2004 Selective Service System (SSS) budget to prepare for a military draft that could start as early as June 15, 2005. Selective Service must report to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the system, which has lain dormant for decades, is ready for activation. Please see website: www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view the sss annual performance plan - fiscal year 2004.

The pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to fill all 10,350 draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots nationwide.. Though this is an unpopular election year topic, military experts and influential members of congress are suggesting that if Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan [and a permanent state of war on "terrorism"] proves accurate, the U.S. may have no choice but to draft.

Congress brought twin bills, S. 89 and HR 163 forward this year, http://www.hslda.org/legislation/na...s89/default.asp entitled the Universal National Service Act of 2003, "to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons [age 18--26] in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." These active bills currently sit in the committee on armed services.

Dodging the draft will be more difficult than those from the Vietnam era.

College and Canada will not be options. In December 2001, Canada and the U.S. signed a "smart border declaration," which could be used to keep would-be draft dodgers in. Signed by Canada's minister of foreign affairs, John Manley, and U.S. Homeland Security director, Tom Ridge, the declaration involves a 30-point plan which implements, among other things, a "pre-clearance agreement" of people entering and departing each country. Reforms aimed at making the draft more equitable along gender and class lines also eliminates higher education as a shelter. Underclassmen would only be able to postpone service until the end of their current semester. Seniors would have until the end of the academic year.


Even those voters who currently support US actions abroad may still object to this move, knowing their own children or grandchildren will not have a say about whether to fight. Not that it should make a difference, but this plan, among other things, eliminates higher education as a shelter and includes women in the draft.

The public has a right to air their opinions about such an important decision.

Please send this on to all the friends, parents, aunts and uncles, grandparents, and cousins that you know. Let your children know too -- it's their future, and they can be a powerful voice for change!

Please also contact your representatives to ask them why they aren't telling their constituents about these bills -- and contact newspapers and other media outlets to ask them why they're not covering this important story.
heart1e55m00mba: (Squall_iconsomnia)
Read and taken from [livejournal.com profile] danwilde:

The American Family Association has decided to try and "prove a point" by having a poll on their website for folks to take about their opinion on gay marriage. They intend to present the results of this poll to the United States Congress in an attempt to instate a federal law against Gay Marriage.

It's obvious that they think that this poll will come out in their favor, and that the vast majority of people will vote to keep marriage for traditional couples only. However, this is LiveJournal, and we are FAR from traditional!

I ask you all to please visit http://www.afa.net/petitions/marriagepoll.asp and let your opinion be heard. It takes about 45 seconds, and it is SUCH an important topic. Whether you are gay or straight, conservative or liberal, your opinion matters, and you NEED to vote here.

While it's obvious that I am on the "pro gay marriage" side of the fence, I still want you to vote if you are against it. The point here is to have a LEGITIMATE cross section of people voting in this poll. The only folks who were even made aware of its existence were the people on the AFA's mailing list and the people who happened to wander across their website. They have absolutely every intention of presenting this poll in the form of a petition to congress against gay marriage. I wonder if they will still present it when the YAYs outweigh the NAYs?

PLEASE let your voice be heard.


We repeat, conservative jackasses...

Profile

heart1e55m00mba: (Default)
heart1e55m00mba

January 2011

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2017 04:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios